Autologous Fascial Slings: a clinical update

Dalia Saidan, Karen Guerrero



Autologous Facial Slings (AFS) were first described by Aldridge in 1942. They are recommended as a treatment option for Stress urinary Incontinence (SUI) in women by NICE.

 With rising concerns about mesh implants alternatives to Tension-Free Mid Urethral Tapes are gaining popularity.

 In this article we aim to update our readers on recently published studies involving the use of AFS as an alternative to mid-urethral tapes, in the management of SUI in women




A literature search of Cochrane Library, Embase and Pubmed was conducted, using the keywords: Autologous fascial slings, stress urinary incontinence slings, surgery, tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension




We identified a number of case series, however only three comparative trials comparing were found evaluating AFS to vs. mid urethral tapes. One trial was found comparing AFS to Burch colposuspension. We plan to discuss these in details highlighting key learning points


There is limited literature comparing AFS to mid other surgical procedures for SUI.

Key advantages appear to be offered by AFS, such as better long-term outcomes. The procedure however does have a distinct complication profile, such as a higher risk of voiding dysfunction.


There is a role for AFS in clinical practice, especially in women wishing a non-mesh surgical alternative for SUI. Patients need to be appropriately counselled of the potential benefits and risks to allow informed decision-making.


autologous fascial sling; stress urinary incontinence slings; tension-free vaginal tape; colposuspension

Full Text:




Urinary incontinence in women: management. NICE September 2013 Clinical guideline [CG171]

Opinion on the safety of meshes used in urogynaecological surgery; Scientific committee on emerging and newly identified health risks, 2015.

Mesh in Gynaecological surgery, the use of. (Scientific impact paper No 19), RCOG, 2010

The Scottish Independent review of the use, safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh implants in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Bang S-L, Belal M. Autologous pubovaginal slings: back to the future or a lost art? Research and Reports in Urology. 2016; 8:11-20. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S96957.

Aldridge A. Transplantation of fascia for the relief of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1942; 44:398–441.

Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997–2016: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet , Volume 0 , Issue 0.

Insertion of biological slings for stress urinary incontinence in women NICE January 2006 Interventional procedures guidance [IPG154]

Guerrero K, Watkins A, Emery S, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two autologous fascial sling techniques for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: short, medium and long-term follow-up. Int Uro- gynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2007; 18:1263–70

Sibbald Bonnie, Roland Martin. Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ 1998; 316 :201

Uebersax JS,WymanJF, Shumaker SA, et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn. 1995; 14:131–9

Wadie, Bassem S. et al. Autologous Fascial Sling vs. Polypropylene Tape at short-term follow up: a prospective randomized study. The Journal of Urology, Sept 2005; 174:990 - 993

Amaro, Joao L. et al . Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after autologous fascial sling and tension-free vaginal tape: a prospective randomized trial. Int. braz j urol, Feb 2009; 35: 60-67.

Guerrero K, Emery S, Wareham K, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing TVT, Pelvicol and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. BJOG. 2010; 117: 1493-1503

Khan ZA, Nambiar A,et al. Long-term follow-up of a multicenter randomised controlled trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape, xenograft and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int. 2015; 115:968–977.

Albo, ME et al. Burch Colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007 May 24;356:2143-55

Brubaker, L et al. “Five Year Continence Rates, Satisfaction and Adverse Events of Burch Urethropexy and Fascial Sling Surgery for Urinary Incontinence.” The Journal of urology. 2012.187.4: 1324–1330.

Chai TC, Albo ME, Richter HE, et al. Complications in Women Undergoing Burch Colposuspension Versus Autologous Rectus Fascia Sling for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence. The Journal of urology. 2009;181(5):2192-2197. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.019.



  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.